Sunday, January 17, 2010

Vipassana Meditation (The Buddha's technique)- An Introduction (www.dhamma.org)

The Technique
Vipassana, which means to see things 'as they really are,' is one of India's most ancient techniques of meditation. It was rediscovered by Gotama Buddha more than 2500 years ago and was taught by him as a universal remedy for universal ills, i.e., an Art Of Living.
This non-sectarian technique aims for the total eradication of mental impurities and the resultant highest happiness of full liberation. Healing, not merely the curing of diseases, but the essential healing of human suffering, is its purpose.
Vipassana is a way of self-transformation through self-observation. It focuses on the deep interconnection between mind and body, which can be experienced directly by disciplined attention to the physical sensations that form the life of the body, and that continuously interconnect and condition the life of the mind. It is this observation-based, self-exploratory journey to the common root of mind and body that dissolves mental impurity, resulting in a balanced mind full of love and compassion.
The scientific laws that operate one's thoughts, feelings, judgements and sensations become clear. Through direct experience, the nature of how one grows or regresses, how one produces suffering or frees oneself from suffering is understood. Life becomes characterized by increased awareness, non-delusion, self-control and peace.
The Tradition
Since the time of Buddha, Vipassana has been handed down, to the present day, by an unbroken chain of teachers. Although Indian by descent, the current teacher in this chain, Mr. S.N. Goenka, was born and raised in Burma (Myanmar). While living there he had the good fortune to learn Vipassana from his teacher, Sayagyi U Ba Khin who was at the time a high Government official. After receiving training from his teacher for fourteen years, Mr. Goenka settled in India and began teaching Vipassana in 1969. Since then he has taught tens of thousands of people of all races and all religions in both the East and West. In 1982 he began to appoint assistant teachers to help him meet the growing demand for Vipassana courses.
The Courses
The technique is taught at ten-day residential courses during which participants follow a prescribed Code of Discipline, learn the basics of the method, and practice sufficiently to experience its beneficial results.
The course requires hard, serious work. There are three steps to the training. The first step is, for the period of the course, to abstain from killing, stealing, sexual activity, speaking falsely, and intoxicants. This simple code of moral conduct serves to calm the mind, which otherwise would be too agitated to perform the task of self-observation.
The next step is to develop some mastery over the mind by learning to fix one's attention on the natural reality of the ever changing flow of breath as it enters and leaves the nostrils.
By the fourth day the mind is calmer and more focused, better able to undertake the practice of Vipassana itself: observing sensations throughout the body, understanding their nature, and developing equanimity by learning not to react to them.
Finally, on the last full day participants learn the meditation of loving kindness or goodwill towards all, in which the purity developed during the course is shared with all beings.
A short video (5.7 MB) about the observation of breath and bodily sensations in this technique can be viewed with the free QuickTime movie player. http://www.vridhamma.org/Video.aspx
The entire practice is actually a mental training. Just as we use physical exercises to improve our bodily health, Vipassana can be used to develop a healthy mind.
Because it has been found to be genuinely helpful, great emphasis is put on preserving the technique in its original, authentic form. It is not taught commercially, but instead is offered freely. No person involved in its teaching receives any material remuneration.
There are no charges for the courses - not even to cover the cost of food and accommodation. All expenses are met by donations from people who, having completed a course and experienced the benefits of Vipassana, wish to give others the opportunity to benefit from it also.
Of course, the results come gradually through continued practice. It is unrealistic to expect all problems to be solved in ten days. Within that time, however, the essentials of Vipassana can be learned so that it can be applied in daily life. The more the technique is practiced, the greater the freedom from misery, and the closer the approach to the ultimate goal of full liberation. Even ten days can provide results which are vivid and obviously beneficial in everyday life.
All sincere people are welcome to join a Vipassana course to see for themselves how the technique works and to measure the benefits. Vipassana Courses are even being conducted in prisons, with great success and wonderful benefits for the inmates who participate. All those who try it will find Vipassana to be an invaluable tool with which to achieve and share real happiness with others.
You may apply for a Vipassana meditation course by completing and submitting an application for a scheduled course.
Mr. S.N. Goenka                                               
Goenkaji's Background
Mr. Goenka is a householder teacher of Vipassana meditation in the tradition of the late Sayagyi U Ba Khin of Burma (Myanmar).
Although Indian by descent, Mr. Goenka was born and raised in Burma. While living in Burma he had the good fortune to come into contact with U Ba Khin, and to learn the technique of Vipassana from him. After receiving training from his teacher for fourteen years, Mr. Goenka settled in India and began teaching Vipassana in 1969. In a country still sharply divided by differences of caste and religion, the courses offered by Mr. Goenka have attracted thousands of people from every part of society. In addition, many people from countries around the world have come to join courses in Vipassana meditation.
Mr. Goenka has taught tens of thousands of people in more than 300 courses in India and in other countries, East and West. In 1982 he began to appoint assistant teachers to help him to meet the growing demand for courses. Meditation centres have been established under his guidance in India, Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, France, the United Kingdom, Japan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Burma, Nepal and other countries.
The technique which S.N.Goenka teaches represents a tradition that is traced back to the Buddha. The Buddha never taught a sectarian religion; he taught Dhamma - the way to liberation - which is universal. In the same tradition, Mr. Goenka's approach is totally non-sectarian. For this reason, his teaching has a profound appeal to people of all backgrounds, of every religion and no religion, and from every part of the world.
In the Summer of 2000, Mr. Goenka, the principal teacher of Vipassana Meditation visited the United States and spoke, along with other world spiritual leaders, at the "Millennium World Peace Summit" at the United Nations World Headquarters in New York.
S.N. Goenka Addresses Peace Summit
By Bill Higgins
Date: August 29, 2000
NEW YORK — Vipassana Acharya S.N. Goenka addressed the delegates to the Millennium World Peace Summit as they gathered in the United Nations General Assembly Hall today - first ever gathering of religious and spiritual leaders in the UN.
Mr. Goenka's speech, in the session entitled Conflict Transformation, focussed on the themes of religious harmony, tolerance and peaceful coexistence.
"Rather than converting people from one organized religion to another organized religion," said Mr. Goenka, "we should try to convert people from misery to happiness, from bondage to liberationand from cruelty to compassion."
Mr. Goenka gave his speech during the Summit's afternoon session to a group that included roughly two thousand delegates and observers. Mr. Goenka spoke in the session that followed CNN founder Ted Turner's speech. Mr. Turner is one of the Summit's financial patrons.
In keeping with the Summit's theme of seeking world peace, Mr. Goenka stressed in his speech that peace in the world cannot be achieved unless there is peace within individuals. "There cannot be peace in the world when people have anger and hatred in their hearts. Only with love and compassion in the heart is world peace attainable."
An important aspect of the Summit is the effort to reduce sectarian conflict and tension. Regarding this Mr. Goenka said, "When there is anger and hatred within, one becomes miserable irrespective of whether one is a Christian or a Hindu or a Muslim."
Similarly he said to a thunderous applause, "One who has love and compassion with a pure heart experiences the Kingdom of Heaven within. This is the Law of Nature, or if one would rather, God's will."
Appropriately to a crowd that included major world religious leaders he said, "Let us focus on the commonalties of all religions, on the inner core of all religions which is purity of heart. We should all give importance to this aspect of religion and avoid conflict over the outer shell of the religions, which is various rites, rituals, festivals and dogmas."
In summing up Mr. Goenka quoted the Emperor Ashoka who in one of his Rock Edicts said, "One should not honor only one's own religion and condemn other religions. Instead, one should honor other religions for various reasons. By so doing one helps one's own religion to grow and also renders service to the religions of others. In acting otherwise one digs the grave of one's own religion and harms other religions as well. Someone who honors his own religion and condemns other religions may do so out of devotion to his religion, thinking, 'I will glorify my religion'; but his actions injure his own religion more gravely. Concord is good. Let all listen and be willing to listen to the doctrines professed by others."
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan has called the Summit "a gathering of the world's pre-eminent religious and spiritual leaders in a united call for peace that will hopefully strengthen the prospect for peace as we enter the new millennium."
Spiritual leaders who've been invited to the U.N.'s first-ever conference of this kind include Pramukh Swami of Swami Narayana Movement, Swami Dayananda Saraswati, Swami Agniwesh, Mata Amritanandamayi Devi and Dada Wasvani as well as eminent scholars such as Dr Karan Singh and L. M. Singhvi.
In reference to the participants' religious and cultural diversity, Annan has said, "the United Nations is a tapestry, not only of suits and saris but of clerics' collars, nuns' habits and lamas' robes; of miters, skullcaps and yarmulkes."
Though Annan has been repeatedly questioned about the Tibetan leaders absence, he has attempted to steer questions back to the Summit's goal, which he says are "to restore religion to its rightful role as peacemaker and pacifier — the problem of conflict is never the Bible or the Torah or the Koran. Indeed, the problem is never the faith — it is the faithful and how we behave towards each other. You must, once again, teach your faithful the ways of peace and the ways of tolerance."
The U.N. leader's hope is that since 83% of the world's population adheres to a formal religious or spiritual belief system, these religious leaders can influence their followers towards peace.
The U.N. is hoping the conference will move the world community towards, in the words of one document, "to acknowledge its spiritual potential and recognize that it is within our power to eradicate the worst form of human brutality — war — as well as one of the root causes of war — poverty. The time is ripe for the world's spiritual leadership to work more closely with the United Nations in its effort to address the pressing needs of humankind."
The Summit will end this Thursday on 31 August when participants will sign a Declaration for World Peace and form an International Advisory Council of Religious and Spiritual Leaders, which will work with the United Nations and the U.N. Secretary-General in peacemaking and peacekeeping efforts.
"The goal of the International Advisory Council of Religious and Spiritual Leaders is to enhance and strengthen the work of the United Nations," said Bawa Jain, the Secretary-General of the World Peace Summit. "It is our earnest hope that in times of conflict, the world's great religious and spiritual leaders can be parachuted into these hotspot to seek non-violent resolutions to the conflicts."
U.N. Address (complete)
The following is the complete text of the address given by Mr. Goenka on Tuesday, 29 August 2000 in the United Nations General Assembly Hall to the participants of the Millennium World Peace Summit.
When there is darkness, light is needed. Today, with so much agony caused by violent conflict, war and bloodshed, the world badly needs peace and harmony. This is a great challenge for religious and spiritual leaders. Let us accept this challenge.
Every religion has an outer form or shell, and an inner essence or core. The outer shell consists of rites, rituals, ceremonies, beliefs, myths and doctrines. These vary from one religion to another. But there is an inner core common to all religions: the universal teachings of morality and charity, of a disciplined and pure mind full of love, compassion, goodwill and tolerance. It is this common denominator that religious leaders ought to emphasize, and that religious adherents ought to practice. If proper importance is given to the essence of all religions and greater tolerance is shown for their superficial aspects, conflict can be minimized.
All persons must be free to profess and follow their faith. In doing so, however, they must be careful not to neglect the practice of the essence of their religion, not to disturb others by their own religious practices, and not to condemn or belittle other faiths.
Given the diversity of faiths, how do we surmount the differences and achieve a concrete plan for peace? The Buddha, the Enlightened One, was often approached by people of different views. To them he would say, "Let us set aside our differences. Let us give attention to what we can agree on, and let us put it into practice. Why quarrel?" That wise counsel still retains its worth today.
I come from an ancient land that has given rise to many different schools of philosophy and spirituality over the millennia. Despite isolated instances of violence, my country has been a model of peaceful co-existence. Some 2300 years ago it was ruled by Ashoka the Great, whose empire extended from present-day Afghanistan to Bangladesh. Throughout his realm, this compassionate ruler caused edicts to be inscribed on stone, proclaiming that all faiths should be respected; and as a result, followers of all spiritual traditions felt secure under his sway. He asked people to live a moral life, to respect parents and elders, and to abstain from killing. The words in which he exhorted his subjects are still relevant today:
One should not honor only one's own religion and condemn other religions. Instead, one should honor other religions for various reasons. By so doing one helps one's own religion to grow and also renders service to the religions of others. In acting otherwise one digs the grave of one's own religion and harms other religions as well. Someone who honors his own religion and condemns other religions may do so out of devotionto his religion, thinking, 'I will glorify my religion'; but his actions injure his own religion more gravely. Concord is good. Let all listen and be willing to listen to the doctrines professed by others. (Rock Edict12)
Emperor Ashoka represents a glorious tradition of tolerant co-existence and peaceful synthesis. That tradition lives on among governments and rulers today. An example is the noble monarch of Oman, who has donated land for churches and temples of other faiths while practicing his own religion with all devotion and diligence. I am sure that such compassionate rulers and governments will continue to arise in future in many lands around the world. As it is said, "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God."
It is all too clear that the votaries of violence primarily hurt their own kith and kin. They may do so directly, through their intolerance, or indirectly, by provoking a violent response to their actions. On the other hand, it is said, "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy." This is the law of nature. It may equally be called the decree or way of God. The Buddha said, "Animosity can be eradicated not by animosity but only by its opposite. This is an eternal Dharma [spiritual law]." What is called Dharma in India has nothing to do with Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Sikhism or any other "ism". It is this simple truth: before you harm others, you first harm yourself by generating mental negativity; and by removing the negativity, you can find peace within and strengthen peace in the world.
Peace of Mind For World Peace
Every religion worthy of the name calls on its followers to live a moral and ethical way of life, to attain mastery over the mind and to cultivate purity of heart. One tradition tells us, "Love thy neighbor"; another says, Salaam walekum - "May peace be with you"; still another says, Bhavatu sabbamangalam or Sarve bhavantu sukhinah - "May all beings be happy." Whether it is the Bible, the Koran or the Gita, the scriptures call for peace and amity. From Mahavir to Jesus, all great founders of religions have been ideals of tolerance and peace. Yet our world is often driven by religious and sectarian strife, or even war - because we give importance only to the outer shell of religion and neglect its essence. The result is a lack oflove and compassion in the mind.
Peace in the world cannot be achieved unless there is peace within individuals. Agitation and peace cannot co-exist. One way to achieve inner peace is Vipassana or insight meditation - a non-sectarian, scientific, results-oriented technique of self-observation and truth realization. Practice of this technique brings experiential understanding of how mind and body interact. Everytime negativity arises in the mind, such as hatred, it triggers unpleasant sensations within the body. Every time the mind generates selfless love, compassion and good will, the entire body is flooded with pleasant sensations. Practice of Vipassana also reveals that mental action precedes every physical and vocal action, determining whether that action will be wholesome or unwholesome. Mind matters most. That is why we must find practical methods to make the mind peaceful and pure. Such methods will amplify the effectiveness of the joint declaration emerging from this World Peace Summit.
Ancient India gave two practices to the world. One is the physical exercise of yoga postures (Asanas) and breath control (Pranayama) for keeping the body healthy. The other is the mental exercise of Vipassana for keeping the mind healthy. People of any faith can and do practice both these methods. At the same time, they may follow their own religions in peace and harmony; there is no necessity for conversion, a common source of tension and conflict.
For society to be peaceful, more and more members of society must be peaceful. As leaders, we have a responsibility to set an example, to be an inspiration. A sage once said, "A balanced mind is necessary to balance the unbalanced mind of others."
More broadly, a peaceful society will find a way to live in peace with its natural setting. We all understand the need to protect the environment, to stop polluting it. What prevents us from acting on this understanding is the stock of mental pollutants, such as ignorance, cruelty or greed. Removing such pollutants will promote peace among human beings, as well as a balanced, healthy relationship between human society and its natural environment. This is how religion can foster environmental protection.
Non-Violence: the Key to a Definition of Religion
There are bound to be differences between religions. However, by gathering at this World Peace Summit, leaders of all the major faiths have shown that they want to work for peace. Let peace then be the first principle of "universal religion". Let us declare together that we shall abstain from killing, that we condemn violence. I also urge political leaders to join in this declaration, given the key role they play in bringing either peace or war. Whether or not they join us, at least let us all make avow here and now: instead of condoning violence and killing, let us declare that we unconditionally condemn such deeds, especially violence perpetrated in the name of religion.
Certain spiritual leaders have had the sagacity and courage to condemn violence committed in the name of their own faith. There may be different philosophical and theological views of the act of seeking forgiveness or regretting past violence and killing; but the very acknowledgment of violence performed in the past implies that it was wrong and that it will not be condoned in future.
Under the aegis of the United Nations, let us try to formulate a definition of religion and spirituality highlighting non-violence, and refusing to countenance violence or killing. There would be no greater misfortune for humanity than a failure to define religion as synonymous with peace. This Summit could propose a concept of "universal religion" or "non-sectarian spirituality", for endorsement by the U.N.
I am sure that this Summit will help focus the world's attention on the true purpose of religion:
  • Religion sets us not apart;
  • It teaches peace and purity of heart.
I congratulate the organizers of this historic Summit for their vision and efforts. And I congratulate the religious and spiritual leaders who have had the maturity to work for reconciliation, giving hope to humanity that religion and spirituality will lead to a peaceful future.
May all beings be free from aversion and be happy. May peace and harmony prevail.
Everyone seeks peace and harmony, because this is what we lack in our lives. From time to time we all experience agitation, irritation, dishar­mony. And when we suffer from these miseries, we don't keep them to ourselves; we often distribute them to others as well. Unhappiness permeates the atmosphere around someone who is miserable, and those who come in contact with such a person also become affected. Certainly this is not a skillful way to live.
We ought to live at peace with ourselves, and at peace with others. After all, human beings are social beings, having to live in society and deal with each other. But how are we to live peacefully? How are we to remain harmonious within, and maintain peace and harmony around us, so that others can also live peacefully and harmoniously?
In order to be relieved of our misery, we have to know the basic reason for it, the cause of the suffering. If we investigate the problem, it becomes clear that whenever we start generating any negativity or impurity in the mind, we are bound to become unhappy. A negativity in the mind, a mental defilement or impurity, cannot coexist with peace and harmony.
How do we start generating negativity? Again, by investigation, it becomes clear. We become unhappy when we find someone behaving in a way that we don't like, or when we find something happening which we don't like. Unwanted things happen and we create tension within. Wanted things do not happen, some obstacle comes in the way, and again we create tension within; we start tying knots within. And throughout life, unwanted things keep on happening, wanted things may or may not happen, and this process of reaction, of tying knots—Gordian knots—makes the entire mental and physical structure so tense, so full of negativity, that life becomes miserable.
Now, one way to solve this problem is to arrange that nothing unwanted happens in life, that everything keeps on happening exactly as we desire. Either we must develop the power, or somebody else who will come to our aid must have the power, to see that unwanted things do not happen and that everything we want happens. But this is impossible. There is no one in the world whose desires are always fulfilled, in whose life everything happens according to his or her wishes, without anything unwanted happening. Things constantly occur that are contrary to our desires and wishes. So the question arises: how can we stop reacting blindly when confronted with things that we don't like? How can we stop creating tension and remain peaceful and harmonious?
In India, as well as in other countries, wise saintly persons of the past studied this problem—the problem of human suffering—and found a solution: if something unwanted happens and you start to react by generating anger, fear or any negativity, then, as soon as possible, you should divert your attention to something else. For example, get up, take a glass of water, start drinking—your anger won't multiply; on the other hand, it'll begin to subside. Or start counting: one, two, three, four. Or start repeating a word, or a phrase, or some mantra, perhaps the name of a god or saintly person towards whom you have devotion; the mind is diverted, and to some extent you'll be free of the negativity, free of the anger.
This solution was helpful; it worked. It still works. Responding like this, the mind feels free from agitation. However, the solution works only at the conscious level. In fact, by diverting the attention you push the negativity deep into the unconscious, and there you continue to generate and multiply the same defilement. On the surface there is a layer of peace and harmony, but in the depths of the mind there is a sleeping volcano of suppressed negativity which sooner or later may erupt in a violent explosion.
Other explorers of inner truth went still further in their search and, by experiencing the reality of mind and matter within themselves, recognized that diverting the attention is only running away from the problem. Escape is no solution; you have to face the problem. Whenever negativity arises in the mind, just observe it, face it. As soon as you start to observe a mental impurity, it begins to lose its strength and slowly withers away.
A good solution; it avoids both extremes—suppression and expression. Burying the negativity in the unconscious will not eradicate it, and allowing it to manifest as unwholesome physical or vocal actions will only create more problems. But if you just observe, then the defilement passes away and you are free of it.
This sounds wonderful, but is it really practical? It's not easy to face one's own impurities. When anger arises, it so quickly overwhelms us that we don't even notice. Then, overpowered by anger, we perform physical or vocal actions which harm ourselves and others. Later, when the anger has passed, we start crying and repenting, begging pardon from this or that person or from God: "Oh, I made a mistake, please excuse me!" But the next time we are in a similar situation, we again react in the same way. This continual repenting doesn't help at all.
The difficulty is that we are not aware when negativity starts. It begins deep in the unconscious mind, and by the time it reaches the conscious level it has gained so much strength that it overwhelms us, and we cannot observe it.
Suppose that I employ a private secretary, so that whenever anger arises he says to me, "Look, anger is starting!" Since I cannot know when this anger will start, I'll need to hire three private secretaries for three shifts, around the clock! Let's say I can afford it, and anger begins to arise. At once my secretary tells me, "Oh look—anger has started!" The first thing I'll do is rebuke him: "You fool! You think you're paid to teach me?" I'm so overpowered by anger that good advice won't help.
Suppose wisdom does prevail and I don't scold him. Instead, I say, "Thank you very much. Now I must sit down and observe my anger." Yet, is it possible? As soon as I close my eyes and try to observe anger, the object of the anger immediately comes into my mind—the person or incident which initiated the anger. Then I'm not observing the anger itself; I'm merely observing the external stimulus of that emotion. This will only serve to multiply the anger, and is therefore no solution. It is very difficult to observe any abstract negativity, abstract emotion, divorced from the external object which originally caused it to arise.
However, someone who reached the ultimate truth found a real solution. He discovered that whenever any impurity arises in the mind, physically two things start happening simultaneously. One is that the breath loses its normal rhythm. We start breathing harder whenever negativity comes into the mind. This is easy to observe. At a subtler level, a biochemical reaction starts in the body, resulting in some sensation. Every impurity will generate some sensation or the other within the body.
This presents a practical solution. An ordinary person cannot observe abstract defilements of the mind—abstract fear, anger or passion. But with proper training and practice it is very easy to observe respiration and body sensations, both of which are directly related to mental defilements.
Respiration and sensations will help in two ways. First, they will be like private secretaries. As soon as a negativity arises in the mind, the breath will lose its normality; it will start shouting, "Look, something has gone wrong!" And we cannot scold the breath; we have to accept the warning. Similarly, the sensations will tell us that something has gone wrong. Then, having been warned, we can start observing the respiration, start observing the sensations, and very quickly we find that the negativity passes away.
This mental-physical phenomenon is like a coin with two sides. On one side are the thoughts and emotions arising in the mind, on the other side are the respiration and sensations in the body. Any thoughts or emotions, any mental impurities that arise manifest themselves in the breath and the sensations of that moment. Thus, by observing the respiration or the sensations, we are in fact observing mental impurities. Instead of running away from the problem, we are facing reality as it is. As a result, we discover that these impurities lose their strength; they no longer overpower us as they did in the past. If we persist, they eventually disappear altogether and we begin to live a peaceful and happy life, a life increasingly free of negativities.
In this way the technique of self-observation shows us reality in its two aspects, inner and outer. Previously we only looked outward, missing the inner truth. We always looked outside for the cause of our unhappiness; we always blamed and tried to change the reality outside. Being ignorant of the inner reality, we never understood that the cause of suffering lies within, in our own blind reactions toward pleasant and unpleasant sensations.
Now, with training, we can see the other side of the coin. We can be aware of our breathing and also of what is happening inside. Whatever it is, breath or sensation, we learn just to observe it without losing our mental balance. We stop reacting and multiplying our misery. Instead, we allow the defilements to manifest and pass away.
The more one practices this technique, the more quickly negativities will dissolve. Gradually the mind becomes free of defilements, becomes pure. A pure mind is always full of love—selfless love for all others, full of compassion for the failings and sufferings of others, full of joy at their success and happiness, full of equanimity in the face of any situation.
When one reaches this stage, the entire pattern of one's life changes. It is no longer possible to do anything vocally or physically which will disturb the peace and happiness of others. Instead, a balanced mind not only becomes peaceful, but the surrounding atmosphere also becomes permeated with peace and harmony, and this will start affecting others, helping others too.
By learning to remain balanced in the face of everything experienced inside, one develops detachment towards all that one encounters in external situations as well. However, this detachment is not escapism or indifference to the problems of the world. Those who regularly practice Vipassana become more sensitive to the sufferings of others, and do their utmost to relieve suffering in whatever way they can—not with any agitation, but with a mind full of love, compassion and equanimity. They learn holy indifference—how to be fully committed, fully involved in helping others, while at the same time maintaining balance of mind. In this way they remain peaceful and happy, while working for the peace and happiness of others.
This is what the Buddha taught: an art of living. He never established or taught any religion, any "ism". He never instructed those who came to him to practice any rites or rituals, any empty formalities. Instead, he taught them just to observe nature as it is, by observing the reality inside. Out of ignorance we keep reacting in ways which harm ourselves and others. But when wisdom arises—the wisdom of observing reality as it is—this habit of reacting falls away. When we cease to react blindly, then we are capable of real action—action proceeding from a balanced mind, a mind which sees and understands the truth. Such action can only be positive, creative, helpful to ourselves and to others.
What is necessary, then, is to "know thyself"—advice which every wise person has given. We must know ourselves, not just intellectually in the realm of ideas and theories, and not just emotionally or devotionally, simply accepting blindly what we have heard or read. Such knowledge is not enough. Rather, we must know reality experientially. We must experience directly the reality of this mental-physical phenomenon. This alone is what will help us be free of our suffering.
This direct experience of our own inner reality, this technique of self-observation, is what is called Vipassana meditation. In the language of India in the time of the Buddha, passana meant seeing in the ordinary way, with one's eyes open; but vipassana is observing things as they actually are, not just as they appear to be. Apparent truth has to be penetrated, until we reach the ultimate truth of the entire psycho-physical structure. When we experience this truth, then we learn to stop reacting blindly, to stop creating negativities—and naturally the old ones are gradually eradicated. We become liberated from misery and experience true happiness.
There are three steps to the training given in a meditation course. First, one must abstain from any action, physical or vocal, which disturbs the peace and harmony of others. One cannot work to liberate oneself from impurities of the mind while at the same time continuing to perform deeds of body and speech which only multiply them. Therefore, a code of morality is the essential first step of the practice. One undertakes not to kill, not to steal, not to commit sexual misconduct, not to tell lies, and not to use intoxicants. By abstaining from such actions, one allows the mind to quiet down sufficiently in order to proceed further.
The next step is to develop some mastery over this wild mind by training it to remain fixed on a single object, the breath. One tries to keep one's attention on the respiration for as long as possible. This is not a breathing exercise; one does not regulate the breath. Instead, one observes natural respiration as it is, as it comes in, as it goes out. In this way one further calms the mind so that it is no longer overpowered by intense negativities. At the same time, one is concentrating the mind, making it sharp and penetrating, capable of the work of insight.
These first two steps, living a moral life, and controlling the mind, are very necessary and beneficial in themselves, but they will lead to suppression of negativities unless one takes the third step: purifying the mind of defilements by developing insight into one's own nature. This is Vipassana: experiencing one's own reality by the systematic and dispassionate observation within oneself of the ever-changing mind-matter phenomenon manifesting itself as sensations. This is the culmination of the teaching of the Buddha: self-purification by self-observation.
It can be practiced by one and all. Everyone faces the problem of suffering. It is a universal malady which requires a universal remedy, not a sectarian one. When one suffers from anger, it's not Buddhist anger, Hindu anger, or Christian anger. Anger is anger. When one becomes agitated as a result of this anger, this agitation is not Christian, or Jewish, or Muslim. The malady is universal. The remedy must also be universal.
Vipassana is such a remedy. No one will object to a code of living which respects the peace and harmony of others. No one will object to developing control over the mind. No one will object to developing insight into one's own nature, by which it is possible to free the mind of negativities. Vipassana is a universal path.
Observing reality as it is by observing the truth inside—this is knowing oneself directly and experientially. As one practices, one keeps freeing oneself from the misery of mental impurities. From the gross, external, apparent truth, one penetrates to the ultimate truth of mind and matter. Then one transcends that, and experiences a truth which is beyond mind and matter, beyond time and space, beyond the conditioned field of relativity: the truth of total liberation from all defilements, all impurities, all suffering. Whatever name one gives this ultimate truth is irrelevant; it is the final goal of everyone.
May you all experience this ultimate truth. May all people be free from misery. May they enjoy real peace, real harmony, real happiness.
MAY ALL BEINGS BE HAPPY.
The above text is based upon a talk given by Mr. S.N. Goenka in Berne, Switzerland.
  Introduction to the Technique
Vipassana is one of India's most ancient meditation techniques. Long lost to humanity, it was rediscovered by Gotama the Buddha more than 2500 years ago. The word Vipassana means seeing things as they really are. It is the process of self- purification by self-observation. One begins by observing the natural breath to concentrate the mind. With a sharpened awareness one proceeds to observe the changing nature of body and mind and experiences the universal truths of impermanence, suffering and egolessness. This truth-realization by direct experience is the process of purification. The entire path (Dhamma) is a universal remedy for universal problems and has nothing to do with any organized religion or sectarianism. For this reason, it can be freely practiced by everyone, at any time, in any place, without conflict due to race, community or religion, and will prove equally beneficial to one and all.
What Vipassana is not:

  • It is not a rite or ritual based on blind faith.
  • It is neither an intellectual nor a philosophical entertainment.
  • It is not a rest cure, a holiday, or an opportunity for socializing.
  • It is not an escape from the trials and tribulations of everyday life.
What Vipassana is:
  • It is a technique that will eradicate suffering. 
  • It is a method of mental purification which allows one to face life's tensions and problems in a calm, balanced way.
  • It is an art of living that one can use to make positive contributions to society.  
Vipassana meditation aims at the highest spiritual goals of total liberation and full enlightenment. Its purpose is never simply to cure physical disease. However, as a by-product of mental purification, many psychosomatic diseases are eradicated. In fact, Vipassana eliminates the three causes of all unhappiness: craving, aversion and ignorance. With continued practice, the meditation releases the tensions developed in everyday life, opening the knots tied by the old habit of reacting in an unbalanced way to pleasant and unpleasant situations.
Although Vipassana was developed as a technique by the Buddha, its practice is not limited to Buddhists. There is absolutely no question of conversion. The technique works on the simple basis that all human beings share the same problems and a technique which can eradicate these problems will have a universal application. People from many religious denominations have experienced the benefits of Vipassana meditation, and have found no conflict with their profession of faith.
Meditation and Self-discipline
The process of self-purification by introspection is certainly never easy--students have to work very hard at it. By their own efforts students arrive at their own realizations; no one else can do this for them. Therefore, the meditation will suit only those willing to work seriously and observe the discipline, which is there for the benefit and protection of the meditators and is an integral part of the meditation practice.
Ten days is certainly a very short time in which to penetrate the deepest levels of the unconscious mind and learn how to eradicate the complexes lying there. Continuity of the practice in seclusion is the secret of this technique's success. Rules and regulations have been developed keeping this practical aspect in mind. They are not primarily for the benefit of the teacher or the course management, nor are they negative expressions of tradition, orthodoxy or blind faith in some organized religion. Rather, they are based on the practical experience of thousands of meditators over the years and are both scientific and rational. Abiding by the rules creates a very conducive atmosphere for meditation; breaking them pollutes it.
A student will have to stay for the entire period of the course. The other rules should also be carefully read and considered. Only those who feel that they can honestly and scrupulously follow the discipline should apply for admission. Those not prepared to make a determined effort will waste their time and, moreover, will disturb others who wish to work seriously. A prospective student should also understand that it would be both disadvantageous and inadvisable to leave without finishing the course upon finding the discipline too difficult. Likewise, it would be most unfortunate if, in spite of repeated reminders, a student does not follow the rules and has to be asked to leave.
Persons With Serious Mental Disorders
People with serious mental disorders have occasionally come to Vipassana courses with the unrealistic expectation that the technique will cure or alleviate their mental problems. Unstable interpersonal relationships and a history of various treatments can be additional factors which make it difficult for such people to benefit from, or even complete, a ten-day course. Our capacity as a nonprofessional volunteer organization makes it impossible for us to properly care for people with these backgrounds. Although Vipassana meditation is beneficial for most people, it is not a substitute for medical or psychiatric treatment and we do not recommend it for people with serious psychiatric disorders.
The Code of Discipline
The foundation of the practice is sīla — moral conduct. Sīla provides a basis for the development of samādhi — concentration of mind; and purification of the mind is achieved through paññā — the wisdom of insight.
The Precepts
All who attend a Vipassana course must conscientiously undertake the following five precepts for the duration of the course:

  1. to abstain from killing any being;
  2. to abstain from stealing;
  3. to abstain from all sexual activity;
  4. to abstain from telling lies;
  5. to abstain from all intoxicants.  
There are three additional precepts which old students (that is, those who have completed a course with S.N. Goenka or one of his assistant teachers) are expected to follow during the course:
  1. to abstain from eating after midday;
  2. to abstain from sensual entertainment and bodily decorations
  3. to abstain from using high or luxurious beds. 
Old students will observe the sixth precept by having tea without milk or fruit juice at the 5 p.m. break, whereas new student may have tea with milk and some fruit. The teacher may excuse an old student from observing this precept for health reasons. The seventh and eighth precept will be observed by all.
Acceptance of the Teacher and the Technique
Students must declare themselves willing to comply fully and for the duration of the course with the teacher's guidance and instructions; that is, to observe the discipline and to meditate exactly as the teacher asks, without ignoring any part of the instructions, nor adding anything to them. This acceptance should be one of discrimination and understanding, not blind submission. Only with an attitude of trust can a student work diligently and thoroughly. Such confidence in the teacher and the technique is essential for success in meditation.
Other Techniques, Rites, and Forms of Worship
During the course it is absolutely essential that all forms of prayer, worship, or religious ceremony — fasting, burning incense, counting beads, reciting mantras, singing and dancing, etc. — be discontinued. All other meditation techniques and healing or spiritual practices should also be suspended. This is not to condemn any other technique or practice, but to give a fair trial to the technique of Vipassana in its purity.
Students are strongly advised that deliberately mixing other techniques of meditation with Vipassana will impede and even reverse their progress. Despite repeated warnings by the teacher, there have been cases in the past where students have intentionally mixed this technique with a ritual or another practice, and have done themselves a great disservice. Any doubts or confusion which may arise should always be clarified by meeting with the teacher.
Interviews With the Teacher
The teacher is available to meet students privately between 12 Noon and 1:00 p.m. Questions may also be asked in public between 9:00 and 9:30 p.m. in the meditation hall. The interview and question times are for clarifying the technique and for questions arising from the evening discourses.
Noble Silence
All students must observe Noble Silence from the beginning of the course until the morning of the last full day. Noble Silence means silence of body, speech, and mind. Any form of communication with fellow student, whether by gestures, sign language, written notes, etc., is prohibited.
Students may, however, speak with the teacher whenever necessary and they may approach the management with any problems related to food, accommodation, health, etc. But even these contacts should be kept to a minimum. Students should cultivate the feeling that they are working in isolation.
Separation of Men and Women
Complete segregation of men and women is to be maintained. Couples, married or otherwise, should not contact each other in any way during the course. The same applies to friends, members of the same family, etc.
Physical Contact
It is important that throughout the course there be no physical contact whatsoever between persons of the same or opposite sex.
Yoga and Physical Exercise
Although physical yoga and other exercises are compatible with Vipassana, they should be suspended during the course because proper secluded facilities are not available at the course site. Jogging is also not permitted. Students may exercise during rest periods by walking in the designated areas.
Religious Objects, Rosaries, Crystals, Talismans, etc.
No such items should be brought to the course site. If brought inadvertently they should be deposited with the management for the duration of the course.
Intoxicants and Drugs
No drugs, alcohol, or other intoxicants should be brought to the site; this also applies to tranquilizers, sleeping pills, and all other sedatives. Those taking medicines or drugs on a doctor's prescription should notify the teacher.
Tobacco
For the health and comfort of all students, smoking, chewing tobacco, and taking snuff are not permitted at the course.
Food
It is not possible to satisfy the special food preferences and requirements of all the meditators. Students are therefore kindly requested to make do with the simple vegetarian meals provided. The course management endeavors to prepare a balanced, wholesome menu suitable for meditation. If any students have been prescribed a special diet because of ill-health, they should inform the management at the time of application. Fasting is not permitted.
Clothing
Dress should be simple, modest, and comfortable. Tight, transparent, revealing, or otherwise striking clothing (such as shorts, short skirts, tights and leggings, sleeveless or skimpy tops) should not be worn. Sunbathing and partial nudity are not permitted. This is important in order to minimize distraction to others.
Laundry and Bathing
No washing machines or dryers are available, so students should bring sufficient clothing. Small items can be hand-washed. Bathing and laundry may be done only in the break periods and not during meditation hours.
Outside Contacts
Students must remain within the course boundaries throughout the course. They may leave only with the specific consent of the teacher. No outside communications is allowed before the course ends. This includes letters, phone calls and visitors. Cell phones, pagers, and other electronic devices must be deposited with the management until the course ends. In case of an emergency, a friend or relative may contact the management.
Music, Reading and Writing
The playing of musical instruments, radios, etc. is not permitted. No reading or writing materials should be brought to the course. Students should not distract themselves by taking notes. The restriction on reading and writing is to emphasize the strictly practical nature of this meditation.
Tape Recorders and Cameras
These may not be used except with the express permission of the teacher.
Course Finances
According to the tradition of pure Vipassana, courses are run solely on a donation basis. Donations are accepted only from those who have completed at least one ten-day course with S.N. Goenka or one of his assisting teachers. Someone taking the course for the first time may give a donation on the last day of the course or any time thereafter.
In this way course are supported by those who have realized for themselves the benefits of the practice. Wishing to share these benefits with others, one gives a donation according to one's means and volition. Such donations are the only source of funding for course in this tradition around the world. There is no wealthy foundation or individual sponsoring them. Neither the teachers nor the organizers receive any kind of payment for their service. Thus, the spread of Vipassana is carried out with purity of purpose, free from any commercialism.
Whether a donation is large or small, it should be given with the wish to help others: 'The course I have taken has been paid for through the generosity of past students; now let me give something towards the cost of a future course, so that others may also benefit by this technique.'
Summary
To clarify the spirit behind the discipline and rules, they may be summarized as follows: Take great care that your actions do not disturb anyone. Take no notice of distractions caused by others.
It may be that a student cannot understand the practical reasons for one or several of the above rules. Rather than allow negativity and doubt to develop, immediate clarification should be sought from the teacher.
It is only by taking a disciplined approach and by making maximum effort that a student can fully grasp the practice and benefit from it. The emphasis during the course is on work. A golden rule is to meditate as if one were alone, with one's mind turned inward, ignoring any inconveniences and distractions that one may encounter.
Finally, students should note that their progress in Vipassana depends solely on their own good qualities and personal development and on five factors: earnest efforts, confidence, sincerity, health and wisdom.
May the above information help you to obtain maximum benefit from your meditation course. We are happy to have the opportunity to serve, and wish you peace and harmony from your experience of Vipassana.
THE COURSE TIMETABLE
The following timetable for the course has been designed to maintain the continuity of practice. For best results students are advised to follow it as closely as possible.
4:00 am Morning wake-up bell
4:30-6:30 am Meditate in the hall or in your room
6:30-8:00 am Breakfast break
8:00-9:00 am Group meditation in the hall
9:00-11:00 am Meditate in the hall or in your room according to the teacher's instructions
11:00-12:00 noon Lunch break
12noon-1:00 pm Rest and interviews with the teacher
1:00-2:30 pm Meditate in the hall or in your room
2:30-3:30 pm Group meditation in the hall
3:30-5:00 pm Meditate in the hall or in your own room according to the teacher's instructions
5:00-6:00 pm Tea break
6:00-7:00 pm Group meditation in the hall
7:00-8:15 pm Teacher's Discourse in the hall
8:15-9:00 pm Group meditation in the hall
9:00-9:30 pm Question time in the hall
9:30 pm Retire to your own room--Lights out
You can go online and book for the course. The website is http://www.dhamma.org/, http://www.vridhamma.org/ for Vipassana Newsletters/other resource material by Vipassana Research Institute (VRI).

Niyamgiri Solidarity Convention, 10/10/2009, Hindi Bhawan, New Delhi (Notes)

Niyamgiri Solidarity Convention (NSC) began with songs by members of ‘Pratidhwani’ group. These songs, originally sung by local activists, instantly struck a chord with diverse audience, enthusing everybody’s hearts and souls alike. This was followed by a two-minute silence for late activist K Balagopal and victims of Korba Chimney disaster.
Members of Pratidhwani Group struck a chord with one and all
Though the NSC programme had a jam-packed schedule, yet all the speakers were able to succinctly highlight problems faced by people living in Niyamgiri. These were discussed within a larger capitalist overtake of democracy through industrial giants as represented by Vedanta, which is currently attacking both local Dongria Kondhs (DK) and their immediate environment by sucking out natural resources from their sacred mountain Niyamgiri, for extracting aluminium and making obscene amounts of money.

<=Poem Recital by Suhas

Prafulla Samantara first spoke about how Dongria Kondhs are “deprived of their human rights when government imposes ‘development’ on them, killing democracy in the process.” He said that by allowing Vedanta to flourish in Niyamgiri, lives and livelihoods of locals have been snatched away, including their forest, water, land and cultural heritage. DKs are slowly losing everything they ever had to excesses committed by this cruel, giant business venture called Vedanta. An even greater cause of concern is that bauxite mining by this company is further spreading to adjacent hills in that area and blatantly draining them all of rich biodiversity as well. So “these are very sensitive spaces that must be saved.” In last four years, he says, goons sent by Vedanta have continued targeting protestors, violating all their human rights, while the Supreme Court has worsened the situation by not signaling Vedanta to ‘pack it’s bags’ and leave Niyamgiri alone. In fact, Justice Kapadia has violated all moral norms by doing injustice. “We must be clear on this fact that Vedanta has come to India just for profit-making” and so it must be unanimously opposed by people involved in anti-mining movements all over the country.
Giridhari Patra of Niyamgiri Suraksha Samiti went on to describe instances where they peacefully protested against Vedanta, showed them black flags, once even gheraoning them, leading to unleashing of repression against them by the company, who resorted to lathi charge to suppress their voices. Utilising extra legal powers, police machinery is busy arresting leaders of the movement to diffuse and curb it. He said that grabbing resources of Niyamgiri, including so many precious herbs, will mean eventual death for the locals. So many cases of human and animal deaths have already come to light, with cases of diseases like severe skin and eye infection also being increasingly reported. He says that only when goondas of Vedanta company push them, beat them and forcefully exploit them that they have to get violent too, but in defense and for survival. Not just exploitation by goons, even policemen sometimes bribe them to buy off dissenting voices.
Prof Mohanty brought together five struggles of Orrisa namely Niyamgiri, Kashipur, Kalinganagar, anti-POSCO and anti Vedanta-Sterlite University struggle within an alternative development paradigm as against a current, dominant development paradigm utilised by the state to oppress many, rather than developing them. He said most of these struggles happen where poorest of the poor reside, in places like Kalahandi. With such rampant poverty, the government, instead of relying upon what people want, brings in an economically extractive process in the name of ‘development,’ with state as facilitator and media as an agent of that process. So, the first problem is about how to resolve acute poverty for so many people. Secondly, destruction of Niyamgiri is a question of human rights’ violation of tribal, who live there and are an extremely exploited lot, with a large dalit population. The Forest Rights Act 2006 stipulates rights of people to their land and how no ‘development’ activity on that land can possibly take it away from them. Taking away land also implies taking away their livelihood and culture, which is unconstitutional. Moreover, since last 60 years, an important part of modernisation policies of governments has been, for instance, developing railway lines, but with the real intention of transferring natural resources from one point to another. Any ‘development’ of infrastructure and industry shouldn’t be destroying livelihoods of people, like it’s happening for DKs. Therefore, such policies must be replaced. Finally, locating this issue within a larger global capitalism development paradigm explains why this (negative) economic process has got accentuated. Although most struggles are peaceful struggles to begin with, but when they fail, then there is no option left for affected people but to use violent means to resist onslaught. It is in this post globalization phase that we all must create public opinion for saving rights of people and against such a concept of development.
From L to R: Prof Mohanty, Mamata Dash, Prafulla Samantara, G Patra & Ranjana)
Sayantoni Datta spoke about the spread of Vedanta mining industries to various parts of India while focusing more on the case of Goa. In her slide show, she highlighted resistance offered by members of Goa Federation of Mines Affected People (GOAMAP) to Vedanta’s mining experiments within the state. In maximum experiences of people staying close to mining areas, inhabitable conditions have been created for them as illegally dumped mining waste has entered their homes, besides destroying their paddy fields by added siltation, for instance in Advaipal. Still, the Vedanta Company has blatantly refused to abide by its mining plan and is using policemen and politicians alike for its promoting its expansion.

Sayantoni speaks about spread of Vedanta =>

Describing negative impact of Vedanta’s mining on all aspects of lives of people inhabiting Niyamgiri or ‘Dongria-land’, which is a notified area, addressed as ‘elephant corridor’, is in the fifth schedule, yet, a long list of human rights violations has been drawn by Mamata Dash. She puts onus of first violation of human rights of DKs by Dongria Kondh Development Agency (DKDA), which was formed by the state to increase their economic sustenance by helping them survive better. However, as it turns out, DKDA is more of an agent of state, especially Vedanta, as instead of being of any assistance to DKs, it’s stopping the implementation of Forest Rights Act, while completely violating all its statutory norms. People from about 26-30 villages have been affected by the refinery leading to complete dispossession for them all. The state regularly uses police force to repress protesting voices, many of whom have been silenced forever, while many others have been falsely convicted to curb resistance shown by them against Vedanta’s attack upon their lives. Rivers have been destroyed for instance, Vasundhara River, which is a lifeline for people of Niyamgiri, has been completely polluted with animals dying when coming in contact with it. Even though all this devastation is in public knowledge and Orissa Pollution Control Board has issued notices to Vedanta, the company has obviously not responded or withdrawn its activities.
As far as resettling DKs goes, the resettlement colony comprises about 200-250 households, 8x8 size per house, with families almost trapped inside and not allowed to speak with anyone. In what reminds us of concentration camps of WW II, condition of women particularly has worsened as they go through exploitation at all levels while working as domestic help in houses of mining officials close by. Overall, not more than 10% people have jobs there and even then, there is no social security guaranteed to any of them. There are extensive labour issues with accidents become a regular feature, most of which don’t even get exposed. Workers perform all kinds of hazardous labour in mines without any safety gear or even any identity cards to identify the person in case of a tragedy. For those whose addresses have been entered in records, even they are entered fictitiously, as migrant labour from outside, not as local DKs!

Tea Break

“When state commits excesses, then it’s our duty to show them what we are made of,” said Arundhati Roy at the beginning of her address. She said that we are facing a dangerous situation because the amount of money involved in mining industry is so large, and it’s directly proportional to violence unleashed on locals, who oppose mining. Commenting extensively on current Home Minister P.Chidambaram, who heads all police forces, and his pro-mining stand on the issue, she quoted him saying on an earlier occasion, while he held office as Finance Minister, that 85% of India should live in cities, as opposed to letting people live in their natural habitats. She highlighted the seriousness of the role played by Courts in matters pertaining to interest of mining company vs. human rights of locals, with disappointing performances by judicial system favouring interest of mining companies in the final verdict. Democracy has been completely hollowed out as even major newspapers have mining interests, she said before concluding.
As the last speaker, KB Saxena pointed out various disturbing questions that touch us all, not just DKs, whose land and livelihood is directly threatened by Vedanta Company. First concern is about the apparent futility of constitutional rights local people have, which are getting brutally flouted every day. In such a scenario, “does having legal rights mean anything to depraved sections of society,” he asks. In case of DKs, which is a primitive tribe living in close association with nature, what are the chances of their survival, he questions, when earlier such tribes, for instance the Andaman tribes, got wiped out on getting forcefully separated from their natural habitat. He fears for similar fate for DKs, who have been removed from their natural environment into a drastically different environment, run by forces of globalization. Coming to the failure of the state to preserve even minimum national interest and threatening us all by virtue of that, Saxena points out that it is only Vedanta company that is hugely reaping benefits from its operations in India, while large sections of people represented by Dalits and the marginalized, who are exploited by mining companies, are deprived of their due share in profits made by the Company. This attitude represents the current development paradigm wherein profit-making is the primary goal, even if one were to sell their humanity. Not even a single political party thinks of taking up this issue concerning marginalized people, posing a serious threat to the survival of democracy itself as human rights violations of large populations are being easily tolerated. Our poor governance system is responsible for such a state of affairs and if DKs cannot be saved today, one day, it will be our turn. Therefore, oppression of DKs of Niyamgiri is an issue concerning all of us.
From L to R: Mamata Dash, Prof Mohanty, Arundhati Roy & K B Saxena

Joint Resolution passed at the Solidarity Convention for Anti-Mining and Land Rights Struggle in Niyamgiri
10 October 2009, New Delhi
Demanding immediate scrapping of mining permission and ensure protection of peoples’ rights to land, forests, culture, and livelihoods in Niyamgiri, Orissa, India
As recently as 5 October 2009, more than 3000 adivasis, dalits, and others, gathered in Muniguda town at the foothills of the Niyamgiri Mountains in Orissa, blocking the highway for several hours. Amidst heavy police deployment and Vedanta’s goons, they were thundering with slogans what they have been asserting for more than five years by now: We will not let Niyamgiri – our lifeline and sacred mountain – be mined, come what may!
This was only one of the many expressions of the people to resist Vedanta’s refinery at Lanjigarh and bauxite mining on Niyamgiri. They have been militantly resisting the destruction of their forests, the fragmentation of their community, the decimation of their culture and religious beliefs, the loss of their livelihoods. On 27 January 2009, over 10,000 men, women, and children formed a 17-kilometre-long human chain around the Niyamgiri Mountains, holding placards that said: Niyamgiri is Dongria land! Vedanta cannot come here without our permission. We say NO!
We the undersigned completely endorse the demands of the adivasi, dalit, and other communities who have lived in and of Niyamgiri for generations and extend all-out solidarity to their struggle in protecting the mountains and the forests, which rightfully belong to them. We also support their democratic, militant resistance to forced grabbing of their land and resources and their fight to reclaim the land already grabbed by the Vedanta Alumina Ltd for its refinery plant.
We strongly condemn the ongoing brutal repression people’s resistance in Niyamgiri is facing everyday by company goons, police, and the state administration. The state criminally abdicated from all its democratic responsibilities of protecting rights to life, dignity, and livelihoods. We deplore the government’s coercive tactics to ram its neo-liberal brand of ‘development’ down people’s throats, while decimating in glory a self-reliant economy of the people, a self-sustaining ecology, rich biodiversity, and dense virgin forests in Niyamgiri—only to ensure profits of a company that is already disgraced worldwide for unleashing environmental havoc and direct human-rights abuse wherever they operate.
We have been closely following all that is unfolding around Vedanta’s ambitious plans in Niyamgiri, hand-in-gloves with the Naveen Patnaik government in Orissa and the UPA government at the centre—the flouting of rules and norms by both the state government and the MoEF in awarding all the required clearances to the company; the way the Supreme Court of India handled the case against Vedanta; the slavish approach of the pollution control board by blatantly ignoring untold environmental and health hazards Vedanta’s refinery has already caused; the misuse of the entire police force by employing it only for the company’s purpose and for silencing any voice of dissent; and, above all, the utter disregard of the company for the rule of the land that it fearlessly displays by cutting down thousands of trees at will, building roads without permission, releasing toxic effluents to the Vamsadhara river, clamping down people to death at will with its errant vehicles, and terrorizing local people by employing hundreds of goons in and around Lanjigarh.
We condemn the Naveen Patnaik government in Orissa, overtly supported by the Union Government from New Delhi, for acting just as an obedient, profit-ensuring ‘agent’ for Vedanta and other mining and metal companies and mindlessly selling the state’s natural resources for a song, and also creating an unprecedented state of terror in the people through brutal repressive measures to the extent of branding democratic voices of dissent as Maoists in several instances.
The ecological significance of the Niyamgiri Mountains – with dense forests, hundreds of perennial water streams, rich biodiversity, and the environmentally responsible economic practices of the Dongria Kondhs and other adivasis and dalit communities – is, in fact, evident in the fact that the whole region falls under a Fifth Scheduled area, which means people’s lives and the ecology of the region should not be tampered with at any cost, let alone using it for the highly environmentally devastating aluminium industry! Moreover, with the impending disaster that is awaiting the planet, in the form of global warming, in which communities that live primarily on nature are the worst affected – and India has a vast population of these categories – India, by sheer commonsense, cannot afford to push further in the name of development such industries that are the primary cause of the impending crisis. And, it cannot even afford to torment and decimate those very people who have kept alive nature’s invaluable resources for ages, thereby keeping alive the planet.
Niyamgiri is the traditional home to the Dongria Kondhs; its foothills are inhabited by other Kondh communities and dalits ...and they all have due rights over the land, forests, and water there. Their lives, livelihoods, and cultures cannot be bartered for corporate profits and a minuscule short-term financial gain for the state.
Therefore, in solidarity with the people’s struggle in Niyamgiri and towards conserving the rich ecological heritage of the area, we demand the following:
1. Immediately scrap the MoU signed by the Government of Orissa and Vedanta/Sterlite for the latter’s mining and refinery projects in Niyamgiri
2. Immediately shut down the refinery at Lanjigarh, and award the local people who have suffered due to the coming-up of the plant and its activities with adequate compensation, in terms of land, money, and all civic amenities
3. Immediately put in place effective and measurable systems of health services in and around Niyamgiri—a constitutional duty the state has so far criminally abdicated from. This is an unconditional duty of the state, and not of any corporation in exchange of people’s livelihoods and cultures.
4. Revoke all the clearances already given to Vedanta/Sterlite for its project in Niyamgiri
5. Stop any processes to clear the pending clearances
6. Declare Niyamgiri a permanent ‘no-mining zone’
7. Drop all legal/criminal cases registered against people of the area for voicing their dissent
8. Investigate cases on attacks against people by the company goons and the police.
9. Allow people of the Niyamgiri area to exercise their rights to choice, livelihoods, and lifestyles
10. Revoke all kinds of forest diversions made so far to make way for mining in Niyamgiri violating the rights of people under PESA and the Forest Rights Act, 2006
***
[The Convention was organized by: Lok Raj Sangathan, Kashipur Solidarity Group, AIPWA, CPI(ML)–Liberation, PSU, Peoples' Political Front, MKSS, NAPM, NFFPFW, Delhi Platform, Kalpavriksh, AISF, AISA, Other Media, Delhi Forum, Kriti, PUCL, Intercultural Resources, PUDR, Harit Swaraj Abhiyan, Lokayan, Pratidhwani, AAAA—Alliance of Academics, Artists and Activists (JNU), SAHELI, and many other groups and individuals and was attended by more than 200 people, including students, academics, writers, lawyers, activists, journalists, and representatives of several civil-rights groups, organizations, forums, and platforms.]
 This Resolution was drafted by organisers.
For all the photos, click here.

Interaction between Gender Sensitisation Committee Against Sexual Harassment (GSCASH), JNU and Members of Take Back the Night Foundation (TBTN), USA: A Report

Date: 09.12.09
Venue: Room 201, Ad Block, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
(to be published in GSCASH's Annual Report of 2009)
Dr K B Usha, Chairperson, GSCASH, began today’s session by introducing the two main guests- Dr Suraiya Baluch, Director, Princeton University’s Sexual Harassment/ Assault Advising, Resource and Education (SHARE) office and Dr Karen Singleton, Director, Columbia University’s Sexual Violence Prevention and Response Programme. Dr Baluch and Dr Singleton are also on Board of Advisors for the US-based Take Back the Night Foundation. This interactive session was facilitated by Ms Diane Brandt and Mr Ramesh Jain from the Embassy of the United States of America, New Delhi.
After a round of introduction of guests and participants (list in the end), Dr Baluch began by first quoting statistics regarding prevalent rates of sexual violence in the US. Every one in three or one in five students reported sexual violence/assault by the time they completed graduation while about one in four women in the US faced domestic abuse, often with an intimate partner. Calling this scenario a ‘silent epidemic’, she said that about 80% women in general public knew the perpetrator beforehand while an even higher percentage of women (90%-94%) knew them beforehand in college campuses, as opposed to the widespread myth that only strangers or unknown people harass women. Quoting data from a study called ‘Drawing the Line,’ she observed that about 60% women reported sexual violence in their Universities while men reported how they only ‘joked and teased women,’ something that amounted to serious harassment for women as it depressed them, made them lose interest in studies, drop out of classes, develop low self-esteem and so on. In another study on younger mid-school children aged about 13 years, she found that about 80% girls were facing sexual harassment and bullying. A similarly high percentage of boys were found to face the same, though most of the times it went underreported. Clarifying misconceptions about an exaggerated rate of reporting of crimes of violence against women, she quoted form a study done by the FBI that revealed that in 97%-98% cases, women actually faced harassment when they reported it. It was only in 2%-3% cases where they made up stories about violence against them. Quoting yet another study done by the Department of Justice, she said about 20% women faced abuse in their present relationship and about 30% have faced abuse in past relationships. Every one in five or one in eight boys faced sexual abuse and found very difficult to talk about it or acknowledge it openly. These statistics reveal that sexual violence and sexual harassment is a challenging problem in the US as well.
After dwelling on statistics of Violence Against Women (VAW) for a while, Dr Baluch then went on to discuss initiatives taken by her group to deal with the current situation within her University campus at Princeton. She spoke about popularising ‘risk reduction’ programmes initaially, which included self-defense classes for women, go-with-a-buddy system i.e. don’t go alone and so on. But all these efforts focused on individuals, so their current emphasis is more towards ‘primary prevention’, which concerns changing social attitudes of people as a community, like questioning men when they casually make rape jokes or rape comments. The aim of such exercises, she said, was to try and change societal norms that eventually lead to VAW by dehumanising and objectifying women. The aim also is to try and create a ‘culture of consent’ or a ‘culture of dialogue’ in communities so that they can comfortably discuss things related to sex, even though media portrays Americans to be a very ‘open culture’ when it comes to discussing sex, but that’s not the case. People need to realise that they’ll need consent of the other person before doing anything they wanted, she said.
Introducing the ‘Bystander Intervention’ (BI) programme in communities, Dr Baluch said that more often than not, cases of sexual violence get bracketed as a ‘family problem’, ‘couple’s problem,’ ‘too complicated a problem’ and so on. So within the BI programme, they try to change this attitude of indifference and make every one feel responsible about intervening and not letting the situation of someone getting harassed, go by. For achieving this, Dr Baluch and her group have conducted workshops, media campaigns, printed T–shirts that say, for instance, ‘Be a friend, not a bystander’ etc. Quoting research on Bystander Behavior, she revealed that more the number of people around the victim, lesser the chances she’ll get help from anyone, which is something that goes against intuition, but ‘pluralistic ignorance’ compels most people to fear physical confrontation or fear embarrassment hence their decision to cop out, especially when they see no one coming forward to help the victim. In this context, she said that the BI programme introduces people to the method of low-key, non-confrontational intervention, for instance by using a prompt joke to disperse tension or talking to the concerned person himself or through someone else, but later on etc. Her group of volunteers meet every week to share experiences about when they intervened in such cases and when they did not, to facilitate maximum learning for every one. Also people, when in trouble, are encouraged to help themselves by making eye contact with a bystander, to personalize that interaction, and instruct him/her to call the police and so on. In that sense, BI programme basically involves interacting with every one from the community, who is present at that moment.
Winding up her talk on primary prevention, she referred to a study done on male assaulters by Dr David Lesack of University of Massachusetts, where he concluded that about 6% sexual assaulters are repeated offenders, who harass four women on an average. Their attacks aren’t impulsive as against the common belief, but planned and targeted against women they define as ‘vulnerable’, namely those who get drunk, who are last to leave parties, who are new or unfamiliar with the campus and so on.
Dr A P Dimri of the Science School, JNU, made a quick comment on Dr Baluch’s lecture before leaving for another meeting. He opined that sexual harassment in the Indian context is a far more hush-hush affair as compared to the US, as the transition for Indian people from interiors to the city is far more acute. Besides that, he said that the social security system in terms of accessing help through dialing 100 or 101 in case of sexual violence in US is something not as easily done in India. He also observed that Indian girls are ‘stronger’ compared to western women when it came to tolerating abuse.
The second main speaker of the day was Dr Karen Singleton, who began by giving background information on the TBTN campaign that began thirty years ago, when women organized a symposium at Brussels to discuss VAW, and took back lessons from the conference to their respective nations, setting an annual trend of revisiting these issues. TBTN was called ‘Reclaim the Night’ in Mumbai, where it was first held in 1978 in India. Many European and American states, especially college campuses have caught onto this campaign to sensitize people against sexual violence, sometimes even organizing month-long sensitization drives including ‘speak-out’ sessions of hundreds of students, faculty and staff till wee hours of morning as is the case with Colombia University, and special lectures in case of Princeton University, all aiming to raise awareness about the issue of VAW. The good thing is that more and more men are getting involved with such initiatives, she said.
Coming to the philosophy and functioning of her programme called ‘Sexual Violence Prevention and Response Programme’ at the Columbia University, Dr Singleton spoke about a 24-hour hotline, that made available instant care and attention to harassed students, whether in terms of physical assistance for immediate rescue or contacting local hospital or police services and so on. A model called ‘train the trainer’ is followed wherein senior students train junior students basics about VAW and ways to prevent it amongst people around them. As of now, about 155 students were arranging workshops based on the above training model, she said. So efforts at Colombia University are geared towards engaging ‘men for education’ of men within a Men’s Peer Programme, who then go back to their respective communities too and sensitize everyone around this issue. In a ‘trickle down’ manner, men on campus are made to gradually relate with the issue and then take back this experience to bring benefit to not only themselves but to the lives of people they come in touch with. Immediate assistance is available for men who self-identify as victims of assault or as assaulters, she informed. A study done on benefit of this programme revealed that a level of sensitization of campus students was achieved along with a heightened sense of responsibility about their behavior towards others. More men were increasingly understanding how they became part of violating others if they weren’t careful and sensitive enough.
Dr Singleton summarized a six-stage process of assistance provided to men:
  1. Assuaging their concerns and fears about getting falsely implicated in cases of sexual violence, addressing their defensiveness, insecurity about this turning into a man-hating exercise etc. They are told that all men don’t rape but neither do all of them interevene, which is why they were there, to realise the importance of getting involved with issues of sexual violence.
  2. Exposing and hence sensitizing men to high prevalence rates of VAW and informing them about impact it has on women. Mostly men imagine very low statistics about VAW.
  3. Together busting rape myths such as it’s alright to rape or use derogatory words for women who’re drunk or wearing skirts etc. Trying to destigmatize and deal with feelings of fear and discomfort with regard to disclosure about violence, guilt, shame, especially since the person violating them is mostly known to the victim. We try to understand, discuss and generate ideas together, about what it feels like to get violated- numb, confused, dirty, socially branded/targeted, developing self-destructive behavior, physical disorders, getting very angry at some point and totally disconnected at another and so on. This sharing is both healing and triggers learning for everyone involved.
  4. Presenting theories of gender roles and socialization for understanding their limiting impact on people by doing certain exercises, for instance, the ‘gender box’ exercise that entails speaking on stereotypical words associated with men and women, with strikingly similar comments regardless of the background of men and women who participate in the exercise!
  5. Facilitating empathy for each other, for instance, by having dialogue about how one viewed other women in their lives (mothers, sisters etc) and how it impacted them, or to discuss what their idea of ‘power’ is or that of feeling ‘powerless’ is and so on. The aim is to try and understand what it feels like to be in the other persons’ shoes and empathise with them.
  6. Taking action that involves performing many activities like ‘role-play’ exercises for participants, which gives them an opportunity to practice what it would be like to intervene in a real-life situation and in a non-confrontational way, as one part of BI Programme. Dr Lesack’s study identifies several characteristics of men, who are potential assaulters, like those who use degrading words for women, who are generally angry towards them, who try and push limits with women in terms of forcing them to spend more time with them when they don’t want to, lacking empathy for women’s’ feelings, men who exhibit hyper-masculine attitudes etc. So it was found to be more useful and effective when men learnt to correct each other for any of the above characteristics, instead of women being told to be wary of a ‘certain type’ of men as that’s too vague to follow. Other than this, volunteers also distribute hand-outs that and a set of recommendations by the TBTN Foundation.
Winding up her speech, Dr Singleton said that at the time they started work long time back, they were a small project with financial problems but today, after years of sweat going in, they are not faced by those kinds of problems at least.
Dr K B Usha introduced GSCASH, as a decade-old, autonomous institution in JNU campus, attributing three specific purposes for which it was conceptualized- gender sensitization through street plays, public meetings, workshops etc, crisis management and mediation (that excludes cases of domestic violence that are handed over to associated NGOs) and a complaint redressal mechanism, wherein a screening committee first decides if the case merits formal enquiry, which is the next level, after which, if necessary, punitive action is taken against the perpetrator. Maximum cases, especially this year, pertain to grievances of one student against another student, she informed. Due to the lack of a legal definition of sexual harassment other than the Visakha Judgment, the real challenge for us, she said, was to decide whether or not it’s a case of sexual harassment at all. Other than that, any case that comes to GSCASH is complicated and multi-dimensional in the sense that it has to be seen in its legal, cultural, psychological aspects as well, since this politically vibrant campus caters to people coming from diverse backgrounds. The administration mostly co-operates with us, she said. GSCASH makes recommendations about concerned students, before final action is taken by the Vice Chancellor as he is the ultimate decision-maker in all cases.
For information dissemination, there is a GSCASH information-booklet that explains rules and procedures of the institution in detail and one-page pamphlets that get distributed to the JNU community often. It talks about myths and facts regarding sexual harassment. The pamphlet was originally conceived by utilizing inputs of students and faculty on the issue.
Ending her speech, Dr Usha believes that there are related issues that need more focus and deliberation like issues of masculinity and sexuality, since JNU too is part of a patriarchal set-up, where both men and women need education to make the much-needed transition.
Akanksha Kumar, the GSCASH student representative, began by saying that JNU hasn’t reached a level where, unlike in universities as mentioned by the main Speakers, men also take up pro-active roles with regard to these issues of sexual harassment. It’s more women, who are interested in taking up such issues seriously. Even the GSCASH Committee membership is 50% reserved for women and of the two student representatives, one at least has to be a woman. In the context of JNU, the term ‘gender’ applies to women more than men and many times, discussions revolve around dresses women wear on campus and how they move easily and freely, even at mid-night within campus. JNU is the first to establish GSCASH Committee in the entire South Asian region after the Supreme Court gave guidelines in 1999, even though it itself doesn’t have such a body against sexual harassment!
JNU being a residential campus, cases that come to GSCASH could be student vs. student, student vs. faculty etc. GSCASH doesn’t cover rape as that is considered as a criminal offence. Domestic violence too falls under another act called the Domestic Violence Act of 2005, so is also out of purview of GSCASH. With that Akanksha invited others to participate in discussions and ask questions from guest Speakers.
Question: How differently is sexual violence and sexual harassment conceptualized and handled in your universities?- Rebecca John
Answer: Responding first to Akanksha’s comment, Dr Baluch said that in the context of the US, there are a lot many covert issues of sexism and misogyny that have to be dealt with, just as the overt ones. There’s work on micro-aggression (against race, sexual orientation), micro-trauma etc which is going on. As for Rebecca’s question, there are different committees that handle cases of harassment and violence. In case of sexual assault, students are free to report cases within University, where they also have facilities for confidential medical/forensic examination. Students can report cases to local police as well, if they like. Though there is no domestic violence policy per se on campuses, the physical assault policy is what is utilized in cases of assault. Students, who feel they have been assaulted can also get their residence and/or classes accommodated to a better time/place slot.
Question: What about fear of social stigma amongst victims, who speak out against their harassers? And does the perpetrator feel stigmatized too? In the case of JNU, levels of social stigma are very high for the victim and the perpetrator, though more for the former. -Shaweta Anand
Answer: It’s a very important question. It’s the same like in any other place, where such acts of speaking-up are seen as committing ‘social suicide’ since most of the time, the victim’s own family objects to them, even friends withdraw, considering harassment or assault as a non-issue, or something a particular man, who’s popular or with straight A-s cannot possibly do! -Dr Baluch
We have to address the problem at the level of patriarchy. For instance, when we had a female Senator, who thought the issue was important, we got pro-women laws passed and legislated. Rape is as bad as murder in the USA but how many of those cases come up and get prosecuted is the question. Laws by themselves don’t mean much. -Dr Singleton
Question: I wanted to first share the context of JNU, where women get preference (5 marks extra) during the process of selection to campus. It’s a place where many cultures meet and live in residential areas, separate for men and women. The unsaid understanding is that males cannot enter female hostels but females can enter male hostels. In such a backdrop, when there was no GSCASH, there was social boycott of the harasser, but with the coming of GSCASH, the time taken to solve cases is so long, that the accused person sometimes submits his degree and moves out of campus, while the case against him lingers on. That could be because of the administration not co-operating, cost-crunch, corrupt police system etc. How can GSCASH deal with these issues? –Neha Wadhawan
Answer: A lot of our work is about imparting training to community within campus and facilitating justice. We do partner a lot with local law enforcement agencies as well. I remember we began in 1990 and have come a long way from there. It’s a long road, with both a positive side and a negative side. Earlier, we had staff and budget constraints, which we don’t have now but what we have now are issues regarding a more consolidated structure and less student participation compared to what it was earlier.
These are some of the things being done around the world like at Rutgers University. There is a ‘Don’t Cancel Class’ campaign wherein, sensitization lectures are promptly given instead of regular class lecture in case that teacher is not available. In case it was a biology class that got cancelled, a lecture on ‘biological costs of trauma’ is arranged, for instance, and in case it’s an economics class, then ‘economic costs of VAW’ gets spoken about. Then, we also utilise bathroom cards that give information about sexual violence. –Dr Singleton
We to have similar bathroom posters urging women to speak up. –Akanksha
We also have public meetings to address these issues. -Dr Usha
Coming back to the earlier point, GSCASH can refer cases to administration, for instance, when someone violates restraining orders, which can then seek intervention by legal enforcement agencies. –Advocate Savita, member of GSCASH Enquiry Committee.
List of Participants (incomplete):
  1. Dr Karen Singleton, Board of Advisors, TBTN
  2. Dr Suraiya Baluch, Board of Advisors, TBTN
  3. Mr Manish Chand, Journalist
  4. Diane Brandt, Embassy of the United States of America, New Delhi
  5. Ramesh Jain, Embassy of the United States of America, New Delhi
  6. Dr K B Usha, Chairperson, GSCASH, JNU
  7. Akanksha Kumar, GSCASH Student Representative, JNU
  8. Advocate Savita, Legal Representative, GSCASH, JNU
  9. Dr Dimri, Hostel Warden Representative, GSCASH, JNU
  10. Rebecca John, Research Scholar, JNU
  11. Deepa, Research Scholar, JNU
  12. Vikas, Research Scholar, JNU
  13. Neha Wadhawan, Research Scholar, JNU
  14. Shaweta Anand, Research Scholar, JNU 
(Photographs courtesy Ajit Kumar)

Following is a report about this meeting published in SPAN Magazine's February 2010 issue.



For all the photos, click here.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Discussion on 'Implementation of EWS Quota in Public Schools,' 15 January 2010

I am happy to have made it for at least some part of the meeting on 'Implementation of EWS Quota in Public Schools' at ISI, Lodhi Road, organised by Pardarshita, Sajag and Asha Delhi. I walked into a hall full of people from the poor community. Mothers spoke of their struggles with school administration and how it paid off while children spoke of how it feels to be poor, yet to 'fit in' at school with children from a better class. Poor children have made it to schools like GD Goenka and Sanskriti through EWS quota. This meeting was about lots of sharing and lots of bonding between people who have fought similar battles but from different locations. Their fight continues...
Here are some photos from the meeting.

 
      

Thursday, January 14, 2010

I am Ruchika

A letter to SPS Rathore
Dear Sir,

I have a story to share with you. Hope you’ll connect with it. If Mrs Rathore could also join you, even though she’s a busy lawyer, who must be diligently protecting human rights of innocent victims...
One man, with a comb sticking out of his back pocket, pushes his way into a blue line bus, whistling a number after watching a morning show at Rivoli -a famous cinema hall in Delhi- already aroused and ready for some real action. The conductor is constantly yelling ‘chalo chalo chalo’, gleefully stuffing in more people in an already jam-packed bus, that too from both its exits simultaneously. I doubt if he would mind using the emergency door to stuff in more ‘savaris.’
There seems nothing wrong with the intention of a bus conductor who stuffs his bus to make more money, especially when the whole world wants to make it at any cost, except that in this situation, i.e. in a bus bursting with people two times its capacity, it becomes particularly disadvantageous for women on board, as men find overcrowding as an excuse to fondle them and if someone resists, they simply look the other way, pretending someone else did the fondling. There would be many takers for such a scene unfolding, especially in a Delhi bus, where molesters do what they want to do and deny it, even to themselves in all probability. Very rarely do women take these miscreants to task for fear of being taken lightly.
When stuck in such a situation, I’ll tell you Sir what I do, hoping you’ll understand me, since you also have a daughter about my age. You’ll be proud of me when I tell you how I fight back a patriarchal/male-dominated system in my own small ways. I openly nag that fellow who misbehaves with me till he gets off the bus or at least changes his convenient position (of pleasure). Sometimes, others join me in public protest or for a ‘trial-in-a-bus’, whatever you may call it, and we settle our scores right there and then, together, using sheer 'public force.' There’s no question of hoping that any legal institution will ensure speedy justice in such cases, because in my personal view, we’ll probably die of natural causes till the time justice gets done, if at all i.e. and how many cases of molestation or sexual harassment can any of such institutions possibly solve, if you calculate number of instances per person? Probably that’s the reason why there’s high tolerance for sexual assault in our country, almost like it’s an acceptable part of our lives, a given which is cast in stone.
Today if you see, India's priorities lie in garnering NRI votes (and investments), increasing troops for national security on Indo-Pak border, suppressing internal ‘threats’ (naxalbaris) by force, then there’s an endlessly tweeting Tharoor, Amar Singh (and now his blog), COP 15 and so on. Sexual harassment/assault/violence pales as an issue in front of these other pertinent concerns that mainstream media generally overwhelms itself with. Even if legal institutions do take note of seriousness of sexual harassment/assault, however rarely, especially in terms of impact it leaves on victims, they can at best act as deterrent for others, but in any case, the harassed victim must take consistent initiative in his or her fight for justice, even if s/he is alone, with or without depending on institutions that dispense ‘justice’ based on subjective and often biased interpretation of law.
I know of many harassed girls, who have become severely depressed, some for years after getting molested, or committed suicide (like Ruchika) or worse, who continue breathing in their perfectly able bodies, but away from most social activities that involve men, lest something reminded them of their hurtful past, forcing them to relive horrible memories. And btw, that memory of abuse, especially childhood abuse, is etched on the heart Sir, and even a physical sample of the beating organ may not expose the painful scars in form of tangible evidence or ‘proof of hurt.’ It’s a feeling of complete violation of soul Sir, that leaves it fractured, and in most cases, for life.
But basically, the moral of this long and probably boring story, is also to share with you some good news, which is that I’m even with most men who have molested me after I grew up. So I not only know my rights but can also approach professionals to take care of me, probably much better than many other women my age. But how will I ever forgive those men, who molested me when I was a defenseless and trusting child? I see myself in Ruchika and can relate to her pain effortlessly.
Dear Sir, unfortunately, you remind me of all those sick, smiling, elderly men- uncles and bhaiyas- at market places, who are familiar faces or neighbours at informal get-togethers, your face sometimes resembling a handful of ‘educated’ college or office colleagues as well! That way, you’re not the only offender or culprit present in society, but unfortunately for you (or fortunately for us), you got caught and criticized publically for your anti-women and violence-driven attitude.
I am not interested in hearing details of the case, though much has already spilled out in public domain, simply because everyone has their own take on ‘truth.’ But my simple question to you Sir, with due respect, is the following: How could a little girl of your daughter’s age (they were both in the same class) turn you on? Mind you, I am making this contention after the Court convicted you for molesting a 14-year-old girl, which by implication means that on your part, you were sexually excited on seeing a child practising tennis on your lawn? This means you held her with dirty thoughts/feelings because your hormones impaired your judgment? You forgot you were a father of a girl too, President of Lawn Tennis Association, and most importantly, you were a custodian of law itself, with a khaki vardi in your cupboard that was even decorated by a medal that time? Shame.
Do you ever think what that molested girl would feel today, had she been alive? How her life would have transformed after that one encounter with you, about which she complained to her parents later. You ever sit down to think that, honestly? Let me inform you then Sir, since she's dead and I'm alive, that I am one of lakhs of adult Ruchikas, who work and continue to face the world today, who still go through molestation as we move in public spaces- roads, local markets, even temples(!), you name it.
Even today, a molester never asks a woman her name or educational qualification before imagining her naked, before he goes ahead and does something to her in an overcrowded bus for instance. All he cares about is that she appears defenseless and that’s enough to qualify her as an object-of-fun for him. Many times, they don't even care about seeing her face because that is not what is of interest to them. But mind you, this power is not his own, it's sanctioned by society because most men bond with the molester/harasser/rapist, 'forgiving' him for his frustrated actions, which is clearly reflected by poor conviction rate in courts of law that are also predominantly run by men.
So my appeal to all women (especially those who feel they are at the receiving end in an authoritative system) is that they should start resisting people who harass them, openly and fearlessly. That harasser could be anyone- a lover, colleague, teacher, friend or even a person you're married to. The only way harassment will fade away from your life is when you stop tolerating it.

Bylines (2005-2007)








































Indian Express, Lucknow



BPL BENEFICIARIES: CIC orders publication of PDS details

http://indiatogether.org/2010/jan/pov-pds.htm
CIC Shailesh Gandhi orders that information about the public distribution system and its beneficiaries should be made public, offering hope that a corrupt system may finally see some reform. Shaweta Anand reports.
13 January 2010 - Musmat Musarrat has two children to support on her own - she is a widow - but she earns a mere Rs.1000-1200 each month to run her family's finances. One source of succour for people like her is the Below Poverty Line (BPL) card she is entitled to from the government. But getting and keeping this document has proved quite difficult.
In Bawana'a JJ Colony in Delhi, Musarrat and many others have been hopelessly pursuing government officials, enquiring about the status of BPL cards that were deposited with them for renewal back in 2007, during a 'renewal drive' by the Delhi government. If the card were with her today, she could have purchased basic food items at subsidised rates under the government’s Public Distribution System (PDS), which is one of the largest welfare distribution systems in the world. But having surrendered the old card for renewal, she is caught between the loss of that card and the yet-to-be-issued new one.
Musarrat represents not only the plight of people of Bawana Colony but also that of poor people spread out in various parts of the city, who are fighting a PDS that is both corrupt and functions dismally.
Pardarshita, a non-profit organisation, has been working to make various governmant departments in Delhi more transparent and accountable through extensive use of the Right to Information Act 2005, and also including communities in this struggle for social justice. "Like Musmat, about 1.5 lakh poor people in Delhi are struggling to make ends meet and running around government offices to find out status of their card. [This is the case with] not only those who have applied for renewal of BPL cards but also those who have applied for new ration cards, the status of which they should ideally know within 45 days of the first application," says Ritu, an activist with Pardarshita.
"This is not the only problem with PDS," adds her fellow activist Rajiv Kumar, "even the ration shops, which should open for 25 days a month, are open only for about five days, if you enquire!"
With complaints piling up from people of many resettlement colonies - Bawana, New Seemapuri, Sundernagari to name a few - Pardarshita filed a complaint under Section 18 of RTI Act 2005 to the Central Information Commission that the Delhi Food & Supply Department is not following Section 4 of the RTI Act, which mandates government departments must sou moto disclose information about their work. Pardarshita sought the list of people whose BPL card applications were cancelled, as well as the reasons for their rejection. Additionally, a list of beneficiaries of PDS system was also asked for.
Following this complaint, Central Information Commission member Shailesh Gandhi notified the Food Secretary, and held a hearing on 21 December. The meeting was followed by an order the following day, directing all concerned to display the following information online and outside 70 ration shops/circles of Delhi, before 31 January. A complaince report detailing how much of this order has been carried out, has also been demanded by CIC, to be provided by 5 February 2010.
The information to be published includes:

  • Entitlement of essential commodities for all type of Ration Cards.
  • Scale of issue of each essential commodity for all types of ration cards.
  • Retail price of each essential commodity for all types of ration cards.
  • Working hours of Fair Price Shops.
  • Stock of essential items received during the month.
  • Opening and closing stock of essential commodities.
  • Name, designation and contact numbers of officials for redressal of grievances with respect to quality and quantity of essential commodities.
  • Daily updating of stock position information.
  • Information about inspection of records by any citizen on every Saturday except for second Saturday as per the PDS Control Order 15/06/06.
  • Display of samples of food grains being supplied through Fair Price Shops.


    The ration shops, which should open for 25 days a month, are in fact open only for about five days.

Soon after these directions by the Commission, its impact can already be seen, at least on the Government of India's Food & Supply Department website, which now provides some information on the above-mentioned lines. According to the order, such information is also to be provided at the points-of-delivery of the rations (i.e. the fair price shops themselves), and that will be an even bigger boost to the transparent functioning of the distribution system.
Disclosure of all this information will be an important milestone in larger struggle for effective PDS in India, which has been going on for many years now. When information regarding the quality and price of grains and other essential commodities becomes available at every FPS, daily, including lists of bonafide card holders and people to contact for grievance redressal at Circle Offices, then there will be much less scope for corrupt officials to deny proper rations to the beneficiaries, or to seek bribes from them to give them what is their due. This should also bring down the practice of shop-owners hoarding essential items for sale in the open market, after diverting them from the beneficiaries.
Moreover, an increasing number of citizens and activist groups will know what to do about unjust practices rampant, and they can in turn intervene on behalf of the poor, even if the beneficiaries themselves are not confident of taking on the system. "The other advantage," says Rajiv Kumar, "is that through the new lists of beneficiary card holders, all bogus card holders will stand exposed. A lot of essential items were earlier taken away from the PDS under the guise of distribution to such fake beneficiaries, and these are instead sold at market rates for earning hefty profits,".
This CIC's order promises to cast new rays of light on the dark corruption of the PDS, and offers hope that poor people like Musmat Musarrat will be able to get the rations they desperately need. ⊕
Shaweta Anand is a freelance writer and a volunteer with Pardarshita.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Dr Dasgupta lives on

I am very lucky to have met Dr Dasgupta, briefly though, at one of the NEST conferences in 2008 in Dandeli, Karnataka. Today, I can say that he left a deep impression that no other can live up to. Did hear about him earlier but found it difficult to instantly relate to him but when I met him personally, and saw him in action, I could see the man's genius.
Remember him looking so 'red' in his bright red shirt and cap :). He came across as such a lively person that all the energetic, enthu people I know can probably come together and still fall short of his level of passion and love for new ideas and thought processes. For instance, while we sat for lunch on Day One of the conference, when some of us were completely unknown to each other, he started off with an impromptu quiz, not sparing anyone on the table! Few of us engaged with him while the rest stared into their food plates, not knowing where to look! I was amused at what he was doing but later on realized that his basic questions about ants and elephants were meant to challenge our mundane, rigid thought patterns and rightly set a 'thinking and questioning' tone for the entire conference. Once I understood that, then it was easy to let go and participate in every dialogue or discourse he wanted us to think abt and participate in, in the days that followed. So all in all, Dandeli was a very enriching and memorable experience, thanks to Dasgupta and all others who invested themselves in it.
Btw, it doesn't feel like the man wearing bright red is no more. He lives on through the impressions he left in our hearts.